♡ The Gang’s All Here ♡

🖤❤️

Emet Selch: We call that a traumatic experience.

Emet Selch, turning to Venat: Not a “bruh moment”–

Emet Selch, turning to Hythlodaeus: Not “sadge”–

Emet Selch, turning to WoL: And DEFINITELY not an “oof LMAO”.

A good rule of thumb for AI is "would you trust a trained pigeon to do this?"

"We trained a pigeon to recognise cancerous cell clusters and somehow they're really good at it" okay great, that's something that could plausibly be a thing.

"We trained a pigeon to recognise good CV:s and left it in charge of sorting through all our job applications" uh perhaps consider not doing that.

look i get the anti ai thing but goodness that's the dumbest fucking argument i've ever heard

Elaborate.

because i won't trust pigeons to recognise cancer cells.. and they can't.. and ai is aiming human intelligence not pigeon intelligence.. and i think your point here is that no one sane enough will let pigeons have the final say and your argument barely manages to mildly implie it which makes it incomplete because by any miracle if it was plausible for pigeons to recognise cancer cells they won't have the final say in it at best they can be used for some level of rating and the comparison of cancer cell detection and resume classification is just not fair and just ends up in jumble of an argument going nowhere

Okay, I can see where you're coming from. Were you awake at school when they were teaching the concept of comparatives? The idea that when you compare two things to each other, the statement is implied to be a closed loop, where things that aren't explicitly mentioned aren't assumed to be present? Like if you say "a great dane is larger than a cat", the only two things that are being compared are the dog and the cat in question. The statement is not disproven by someone pointing out that a great dane is still smaller than a truck.

Let's try another example: "Being raised by wolves would have been a better option than being raised by my parents." This statement only includes two things, and since it's a closed loop, nothing outside of the statement is relevant to this statement. It does not mean that wolves are the best parents, or better than your parents. There is no claim that wolves are good parents for human children. In the context of the comparative sentence, it is only stating that regardless of how bad wolves are at raising human children, my parents were even worse than that.

Now, if we assume that the sentence "a trained pigeon is better at doing AI tasks than AI is" is a comparative, and a closed loop, do you think you can tell me what the statement means in this context?

bro cool fine you win happy?

Darling we weren't even fighting. You saw your own shadow, decided to attack it, and slammed face first into a wall.

babe you are the one fighting and yes using egoistic English backed by a swarm of know nothing rebloggers does help but your inability at forming an argument won't see brighter days your argument is still locked up in the darkest basement known to humankind

1. misunderstanding the original point of the post
2. calling it "the dumbest fucking argument" due to initially misunderstanding
3. giving up the argument after being given an explanation of what the original point meant
4. continuing the argument after already giving up the argument
5. arguing that there never was an original argument in the first place, despite of the fact that the first post that started this was the argument

At this point I'm just curious to find out what you're going to do next.

“DON’T write this character like-“

“Stop drawing them with-!”

“I’m so sick of fandom sleeping on-“

My friend, do it yourself then.

Some people don't know how to draw or write dumbass

Then perish.

Originally posted by eleganceintendent

No but in all seriousness, I have no sympathy for you. I didn’t work for years on my writing voice or artwork skills just to cater to your fandom preferences. No one else in your fandom did either. No one owes you artwork that matches your headcanon.

You have three choices if you want fanworks that match your internal vision;

1) learn how to make fanworks yourself (fic, art, cosplay, gifsets, profile pictures, roleplays)

2) commission someone else to make the fanworks you desire with money or trades, or inspire gifted works by hyping up ideas you like/writing prompts and headcanons

3) eat your lovingly pre-prepared fandom food without being rude to the people keeping your fandom alive

I still don't know my purpose on this planet but I do love reading fanfiction.

me: i wanna talk about my ocs

someone: ok tell me about your ocs

me, suddenly convinced that every single thing about my ocs is stupid and cringy and probably offensive: i. have them

ocs…

ocs……